Security, confidentiality & liability
Security, confidentiality & liability
Your payload data never transits us. The current offer is read-only, in your own tenancy, and asks for no purchasing authority at any stage. The wider access in the second table is what execution would need, and execution is earned, not sold.
| In the current offer | What we can do | What we cannot |
|---|---|---|
| The record | Read-only on the bill, the contracts, the order forms, and the budgets, in your tenancy, control plane only, with deletion terms in the engagement letter | Nothing that can sign, amend, or pay anything |
| The desk, watching | Read-only on the scheduler’s job logs, once you grant them | Nothing that can start or stop a job. Nothing that can place an order |
| Verification pilot | Run an agreed test on an allocation you have approved and paid the supplier for directly | Nothing outside the named allocation and window |
| Purchase decision | The same read-only access, for one reservation, commitment, or renewal | The same |
| Access | Scoped read-only credentials your security function issues — the billing export, the contract repository, the budget system — with SSO, roles for the three seats, your keys where your cloud supports them, and an audit log you can export | No write path to any of your systems. The record is the one thing written, to a store in your tenancy that you hold. No cluster-level or organization-level credential |
| Models on your data | Where a model helps extract a contract or match an invoice, it runs in your tenancy or under zero-retention terms you choose, and nothing trains on your data | No prompts, weights, or customer data; payloads never transit us |
| Not offered today | What it would need | What it would still not get |
|---|---|---|
| The desk, acting Earned | Scoped job submission on named queues and purchase calls to named suppliers, inside a written delegated authority with an approval threshold, a concentration cap, the qualified panel only, your regions, and a named project budget — after a full watch, accepted delivery and liability terms, and written permission from each supplier whose products the desk would order | Cluster-admin. Organization-level billing. Anything above the limit, which stops and waits for a named human. Any order at a supplier whose terms bar third-party purchasing — AWS Capacity Blocks — which the desk prepares and you submit |
| Settlement Last | Paying suppliers on measured delivery, with the credit and collateral machinery built first | Not offered until the desk has acted for real |
Your rates and your contracts are the sensitive asset
Not your weights. Your negotiated rates never inform a cross-customer benchmark or an index, which means our forward view does not improve as we add customers. That is a deliberate trade and we will not quietly claim both.
Bring your own contracts
A supplier becomes eligible only once you have executed the master agreement, the data processing agreement, and the security review. An unqualified supplier cannot be selected at any price. Security approves every supplier, every region, and every access path, and nothing routes around them.
Immutable audit, in your tenancy
Every decision and every change to a contract or a budget is written append-only to storage you own, with who, what, when, and why. We hold a copy; you hold the original. Deletion terms are in the engagement rather than in a policy page we can change, and the whole record exports.
Controls evidence, by gate
A company that has not yet run anyone’s real data and asks to read your contracts owes you the evidence before the money, not after. Each gate is a condition of the next step, written into the engagement.
| Before | What exists | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Anything connects | The architecture, the data-flow diagram, the IAM scopes requested, the subprocessor list, and a mutual NDA | Your security review has what it needs to say no |
| The first paid subscription | A SOC 2 Type I report and an independent penetration test | The controls exist as designed on the day they are tested |
| The first renewal | SOC 2 Type II; source escrow; a written wind-down runbook; a second person who can run an engagement without the founder | The controls operated for the period; the record survives us |
| Any write path | A second penetration test, your accepted security review, and a written delegated authority | Execution, if you ever buy it, starts from evidence you accepted |
Until the first gate is passed, the two smaller starts — a back-cast on a redacted purchase, or a sandbox record built from redacted exports — need no credentials at all; see how to start.
Who pays your adviser
The question that resolves most of this market. Ask it of us as well.
| Who | Who pays them | What that means for your advice |
|---|---|---|
| Broker or compute desk | The seller, or a share of the deal | Advising you to stay put earns nothing |
| Reseller or channel advisor | Margin on the capacity you buy through them | Their recommendation and their revenue point the same way |
| Marketplace or auction | A take rate on what clears | Optimizes for a trade, not for your baseline |
| Serverless or inference platform | The spread between what they pay and what you pay | You never see the supplier’s price at all |
| Commitment optimizer | A share of the savings it reports | A reason to flatter the number, inside one cloud |
| Novation | You. Only ever you. | No fee, rebate, referral, or margin from any seller, ever |
And the same question, asked of the price layer. Every index administrator in this market now has a commercial stake in a place where compute changes hands — Compute Desk runs the settlement layer, Silicon Data’s chief executive also runs Compute Exchange, a marketplace, and Ornn operates its own marketplace beside its index — and the one furthest along operates the delivery layer as well. Novation administers no index, trades nothing for its own account, and holds no capacity. We say that structurally rather than as an accusation — they are on the other side of the same trade, and a buyer will often want both.
Buyer-paid is a structure, not a guarantee. A fee tied to reported savings would still give us a reason to flatter them, so the subscription is flat and the alternative is agreed with you before the decision rather than after it. Excluded at the start, deliberately: validated pipelines, clinical inference, and anything touching protected health information.